Can I have my lawyer appear with me at the CTTT?

The Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal (‘CTTT’) was developed to allow most people to represent themselves at the hearing of an application. The goal of the tribunal is to provide affordable, accessible and efficient means of resolving disputes.
Section 36 of the Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal Act 2001 sets out the circumstances where a party may be represented. That section provides the following rules on representation:
  1. Only by the provisions of the section is someone entitled to be represented;
  2. A party can apply to the Tribunal to be represented;
  3. If the amount claimed does not exceed $10,000, the tribunal must find exceptional circumstances to allow representation;
  4. Representation may be appointed to a party where they are:
    1. A minor;
    2. Disabled;
    3. Impaired from having the ability to conduct their case; or
    4. The regulations prescribe that representation can be appointed.
  5. The section does not apply to proceedings arising under the Strata Schemes Management Act 1996 or the Community Land Management Act 1989. In the case of these matters a party is automatically entitled to representation.
Our lawyers are experienced in advising and conducting matters within the CTTT and appeals to the District and Supreme Court. For advice on the CTTT, please contact Nicholas Pidcock or Andrew Fletcher on (02) 49292700 or by email at npidcock@bemlaw.com.au or afletcher@bemlaw.com.au.
Burke Elphick & Mead™ Lawyers are located in Newcastle and Sydney. We are committed to servicing your Commercial Law, Building & Construction Law, Family Law, Criminal Law, Motor Vehicle Law, Conveyancing, Property Law, Compensation and Workplace Law requirements.
 
The above information is of a general nature only and cannot be relied on as constituting legal advice.  In this respect, we rely upon our Disclaimer at www.bemlaw.com.au/privacy-disclaimer
Posted in Civil Law, Commercial Law, General, Legal | Leave a comment

What is the Consumer, Trader & Tenancy Tribunal (‘CTTT’)?

The Consumer, Trader & Tenancy Tribunal (‘the CTTT’) resolves disputes between tenants, landlords, traders and consumers. The CTT operates under the following nine divisions:
 
1.      Tenancy;
2.      Social Housing;
3.      Home Building;
4.      Strata & Community Schemes;
5.      Retirement Villages;
6.      Residential Parks;
7.      Motor Vehicles;
8.      General; and
9.      Commercial
 
Our lawyers are experienced in advising and conducting matters within the CTTT and appeals to the District and Supreme Court. Although many people appear unrepresented at the CTTT, it is our experience that some quality legal advice before the commencement of proceedings saves a great deal of time and money over the course of the matter.  
For advice on the CTTT, please contact Nicholas Pidcock or Andrew Fletcher on (02) 49292700 or by e-mail at npidcock@bemlaw.com.au or afletcher@bemlaw.com.au.
Burke Elphick & Mead™ Lawyers are located in Newcastle and Sydney. We are committed to servicing your Commercial Law, Building & Construction Law, Family Law, Criminal Law, Motor Vehicle Law, Conveyancing, Property Law, Compensation and Workplace Law requirements.
 

The above information is of a general nature only and cannot be relied on as constituting legal advice.  In this respect, we rely upon our Disclaimer at www.bemlaw.com.au/privacy-disclaimer

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Changes to the First Home Owner Grant – Duties Amendment (First Home – New Home) Act 2011

From 1 January 2012 the current NSW First Home Plus Scheme (“FHP”) will be replaced by the First Home – New Home Scheme.

 

FHP provides exemptions (or partial concession) on stamp duty for first home buyers in NSW on all property purchases, up to a threshold limit of $600,000.00.

 

The Duties Amendment (First Home – New Home) Act 2011 has amended the FHP stamp duty exemptions and concessions by limiting the exemption to first home buyers acquiring:

 

(a)         a brand new home.

(b)         vacant land, (intended to be used as the site for a new home); or

(c)         a home that has been “substantially renovated”.

 

In each case, the home must not have been previously lived in (since construction or renovation).

 

The current threshold limit (of $600,000.00) is still applicable under the amendments and any first home purchased before 1 January 2012 will still be subject to FHP.

 

There are no changes to the current scheme for the First Home Owners Grant, which will remain at $7,000.00.

 

The amendment is outlined below.

 

[11]   Section 80A Definitions

Insert in alphabetical order:

  

home means a building (affixed to land) that:

 

(a)  may lawfully be used as a place of residence, and

(b)  is, in the Chief Commissioner’s opinion, a suitable building for use as a place of residence.

new home means a home that has not been previously occupied or sold as a place of residence, and includes a substantially renovated home.

substantially renovated home means a home that:

(a)  is new residential premises within the meaning of section 40-75 (1) (b) of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 of the Commonwealth, and

(b)  as renovated, has not been previously occupied or sold as a place of residence.

 
Please contact Nicholas Pidcock or Andrew Fletcher for advice on 02 4929 2700 or by e-mail at npidcock@bemlaw.com.au or afletcher@bemlaw.com.au.
 
Burke Elphick & Mead™ Lawyers are located in Newcastle and Sydney. We are committed to servicing your Family Law, Criminal Law, Commercial Law, Motor Vehicle Law, Conveyancing, Property Law, Compensation and Workplace Law requirements.
 
The above information is of a general nature only and cannot be relied on as constituting legal advice.  In this respect, we rely upon our Disclaimer at www.bemlaw.com.au/privacy-disclaimer

Posted in Conveyancing | Leave a comment

Cycling Accidents and the Legal Consequences

Our accredited specialist in personal injury law, Emma Mead, was recently asked by the Newcastle Herald to comment on the number of cycling related accidents in the Hunter. Continue reading

Posted in Accidents & Insurance Law, Civil Law, Compensation Law, General, Legal, Personal Injury, Traffic Law, Workers Compensation Law | Leave a comment

Drug Offences and Music Festivals

Will drug detection dogs be present at any music festivals this year?

Yes. The NSW Police for the past couple of years have expressly stated they will have drug detection dogs present at music festivals such as Field Day, Big Day Out, Future Music, Fat as Butter and V Festival. They have also stated they will continue to have drug detection dogs present at gay dance parties such as the Mardi Gras Party.

In NSW Drug Detection Dogs are also allowed, without a warrant, to patrol areas where a person is entering, leaving or whilst in a premises that sells alcohol (but not restaurants) and any public place where a sporting event, concert, dance party, parade or other entertainment is being held. See LEPRA 148.

I was caught with drugs at a music festival – what are the penalties?

In New South Wales, the charge arises under s 10 (1) of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 – namely any person who has a prohibited drug in his or her possession is guilty of an offence.

The maximum penalty is a fine of 20 penalty units ($2200) and/or 2 years imprisonment.

The actual penalty you receive will depend on numerous factors including the circumstances surrounding the offence, your remorse, your criminal record, any drug history and numerous other factors that your lawyer can advise you on.

If I plead guilty will I get a criminal record?

The Courts consider all drug related offences as serious. Magistrates have the option of not recording a conviction against you even if you plead guilty to this offence. This is commonly referred to as a ‘Section 10’. However, there are several factors that the Court needs to take into consideration when considering making a Section 10. You are best to get legal advice to determine whether you might be considered under this section.

What do the Police have to prove to convict me of this offence?

Beyond a reasonable doubt the Police need to prove (1) your identity, and that you (2) had in your possession (3) a prohibited drug, and that you (4) knew of the drug.

What is a prohibited drug?

A prohibited drug is defined in the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act’s schedule and includes, but is not limited, to marijuana, cocaine, heroin, ecstasy, speed, and ice.

How do they prove I had the drug in my possession?

1. They form a reasonable suspicion and you admit to possession

Most often, especially at music festivals, the Police will form a reasonable suspicion that you are carrying a prohibited drug if a drug detection dog stops next to you. Also, if an officer, who may be undercover, sees you stop or walk in the opposite direction of a drug detection dog –or if you make a comment to a friend warning them about the presence of dogs – then they may form the reasonable suspicion required to approach you and to search you.

Generally speaking, once the police have a reasonable suspicion they are legally allowed to search you. You will be asked if you have any prohibited substances in your possession. If you admit that you do they will ask you to produce it, identify what drug you think it is and they will confiscate it and issue you with a Court Attendance Notice. Some Police will let you still attend the music festival.

2. They form a reasonable suspicion, you deny possession and a Police search locates drugs on you.
If the Police have formed a reasonable suspicion to search you and you are asked if you have any prohibited drugs on you – if you deny that you do – they will then proceed to search you, your clothing and possessions. The Police power to search you arises from the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (“LEPRA”), s21(1)(d) & s36(1)(e).

If they locate any drugs they will ask you what you think the substance is.

What if I pretend I don’t know what the drug is or say that they are vitamin tablets/ washing powder?

If the Police find any substance on you that they think may be a prohibited substance it is likely you will be charged. The Police will send the drugs off to the Drug Analysts Laboratory to prove it is a prohibited substance. Your matter will proceed to a hearing before a Magistrate who will determine on all the evidence whether the charge can be proven. If you are convicted it is likely the Magistrate will hand down a harsher penalty than if you had simply co-operated with the Police in the first instance.

Obviously, if you honestly believed you were not carrying any drugs than you should seek advice about defending the matter.

How can the Police search me?

Police can perform either a frisk search or an ordinary search, and they can ask you to remove outer clothing including such items as hats, jackets, belts, shoes, see LEPRA s.30. They can ask you to open your mouth or shake out your hair if they think you have anything concealed in those places, see LEPRA s21A.

During a search, the police must ask for your co-operation, must search as quickly as possible in the least invasive way, and must ensure reasonable privacy. They must not search you and question you at the same time. They must not search your genital area or breasts unless they believe on reasonable grounds that it is necessary to do so. Where reasonably practicable in the circumstances, the search must be carried out by a person of the same sex , see LEPRA s32.

Can they strip search me?

A strip search must not be performed except when it is necessary and in serious and urgent circumstances. The police must not touch you during a strip search and must ensure your privacy is respected. See LEPRA s 31.

What should I say to the Police if they want to search me?

It is always in your interest to be polite to the Police. You are legally obliged to tell them your name and address – it is an offence not to, and an offence to give them a fake name/ address. You are not, however, legally obliged to tell them where you got the drugs from, how long you have been taking drugs or any other information. You are legally entitled to exercise your right to silence. Anything you say to them maybe recorded by them.

What is the difference between a charge of possession and a charge of supply?

A lot. Possession charges are dealt with in the Local Court and are considered less serious compared to supply charges. See above for the elements of a Possess Drug offence and penalties.

What’s the difference between ACTUAL SUPPLY and DEEMED SUPPLY?

ACTUAL SUPPLY occurs when you are witnessed supplying someone with a prohibited substance, or there is evidence that you were intending to supply someone with a prohibited substance.

If Police observe you handing over drugs to another person, or reasonably suspect you are handing drugs to another person and they search you or the other person and find a prohibited drug then you will be charged with a supply drug offence.

Evidence that you were intending to supply could arise if you inform the Police that of the ecstasy tablets found in your possession you were going to give one to your friend, or they find drugs or cash on you that will lead them to reasonably suspect you were intending to supply drugs.

What are the penalties for a supply charge?

Under Section 25 of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985:

(1) A person who supplies, or who knowingly takes part in the supply of, a prohibited drug is guilty of an offence.

The maximum penalty for supply depends whether the matter is dealt with as a:
Strictly Indictable: fine of $220,000 and / or 15 years imprisonment.
Table 1 matter: Fine of $1100 and/or 2 years imprisonment.
Table 2 matter: Fine of $550 penalty units and/or 2 years imprisonment.

Real life example: A defendant was stopped due to a drug detection dog after exiting a train station on his way to a music festival. After a search revealed two capsules the defendant admitted they contained MDMA and said he was holding them for his friend and intended to give them to his friend. He was charged and convicted of supply drug as he admitted to Police his intention to give the drugs to his friend.


What is Deemed Supply?

If you have in your possession more than a traffickable quantity of prohibited drug, you can be charged with a deemed supply offence. A traffickable quantity is defined in the Schedule of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985. The law is basically saying that because of the weight of drugs found on you – even though there is no evidence you were actually going to supply or intend to supply someone – you will be charged with supply.

I’ve been charged with Deemed Supply but I wasn’t going to supply to anyone. The drugs were for me. What can I do?

It is a defence to the charge of Deemed Supply if you can prove on the balance of probabilities the drug was in your possession for personal use. If you satisfy the Court that the drugs were for your own use than it likely you will be only charged with a possess drug offence.

An example of deemed supply, is when a person is found to be in possession of more than 3gms of cocaine. They can be charged with Deemed Supply and it will be up to that person to prove that they had the drug for their personal use only and they had no intention of supplying it – or sharing it –with anyone else.

Under Section 29 of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985:

A person who has in his or her possession an amount of a prohibited drug which is not less than the traffickable quantity of the prohibited drug shall, for the purposes of this Division, be deemed to have the prohibited drug in his or her possession for supply, unless:
(a) the person proves that he or she had the prohibited drug in his or her possession otherwise than for supply.


Real Life example:

A Defendant was about to attend an all night dance party and was found by the Police to have 16 ecstasy tablets, 1.3 grams of speed, and some marijuana on him. When weighed the ecstasy amounted to a traffickable quantity. Through his lawyers he was able to prove on the balance of probabilities that all the drugs were for his own personal use over the course of the weekend, with no intention to supply the drugs to a second person. He was ultimately convicted of possession charges instead. (Note: the number of ecstasy tablets that will equate to a traffickable amount depends on the specific weight of the tablet – it may be less than 16).

Burke Elphick & Mead Lawyers deliver a large range of legal services including business and commercial law, family law, criminal law, traffic law, employment, wills and estates, compensation, motor vehicle and insurance law. Should you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact our office.

The above information is of a general nature only and cannot be relied on as constituting legal advice.  In this respect, we rely upon our Disclaimer at www.bemlaw.com.au/privacy-disclaimer

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ticket Parking – Can I Stay if I Pay?

Our Facebook page received the following question about ticket parking:

Hi, I have a question about parking. I was recently parked in Hunter Street Newcastle, which is currently 2hr paid parking. At the end of the 2hrs I went back to pay for another 2 hrs as we hadn’t finished what we were doing in town. I paid for the parking and was putting the ticket on the dash when I was approached by a parking inspector who advised that not only do you need to pay every 2 hours but you have to physically move your car every 2 hours and you can’t park in the same spot for longer than the 2hours.
 

Can you tell me if this is correct as there are no signs or messages on any of the signs that advise this? It just states that you need to pay each 2 hours for parking?

    The advice that the car had to be moved is correct. The suggestion that it just needs to be in a different parking bay is not strictly correct. 

    There are three parking schemes in New South Wales. They are:

    1. Metered Parking;
    2. Ticket Parking; and
    3. Coupon Parking.

    As the question above talks about having a “ticket”, the following will focus specifically on the Ticket Parking Scheme. The relevant provisions are set out in Rule 207-3 and 207-4 of the Road Rules 2008.

    Rule 207-3(2) provides the following definition of a "Ticket Parking Area":

    A ticket parking area is a parking area designated by one or more permissible parking signs where information on or with the sign or signs includes the word “TICKET”, but does not include any part of the parking area in which the parking of vehicles is prohibited by another provision of these Rules.

    Rule 207-3(5) provides the offence for parking in the one area for longer than the maximum time allowed on the ticket. That section says:

    A driver must not allow the driver’s vehicle to remain parked in a ticket parking area for more than the period of time indicated on or with the permissive parking signs that designate the area as the maximum time for which a vehicle may be parked in the area.

    Maximum penalty: $2200.00

    You will note that the rule does not have regard to whether another ticket has been purchased or not. It is not the payment of the ticket that determines the maximum length of stay, it is the time indicated on the signs governing the parking scheme.

    Drivers need to be aware that Rule 207-3(5) talks about remaining in the “ticket parking area” beyond the time as an offence. It is for this reason that the suggestion that you can just move parking bays to avoid the fine is not strictly correct. Rule 207-3(5) must be contrasted with Rule 207-4(2) which states:

    A ticket parking space is a parking bay in a ticket parking area that is indicated by studs, pads, plates or strips.

    You will see that a “ticket parking area” is very different to a “ticket parking space”. Drivers should be careful to ensure not to be caught on the basis that they failed to move the vehicle to a completely new area.

    The Rules quoted above are set out in full below.

    207–3 NSW rule: parking in ticket parking areas

    (1) A driver must not park in a ticket parking area unless a current parking ticket is displayed, in such a manner that its date and expiry time are clearly visible to persons outside the driver’s vehicle:
    (a) in or on the front left-hand portion of the vehicle, or
    (b) if a different portion is specified in the ticket in relation to a particular class of vehicles—in or on such portion of the vehicle as is so specified.

    Maximum penalty: 20 penalty units.

    Note.
    Driver’s vehicle and parking ticket are defined in the Dictionary.

    (2) A ticket parking area is a parking area designated by one or more permissible parking signs where information on or with the sign or signs includes the word “TICKET”, but does not include any part of the parking area in which the parking of vehicles is prohibited by another provision of these Rules.
    Note.

    Parking area and with are defined in the Dictionary.

    (3) A driver does not contravene subrule (1) if the driver parks in a ticket parking area before obtaining a parking ticket, so long as the driver obtains and displays a current parking ticket in accordance with this rule immediately after parking the driver’s vehicle.

    (4) A driver must not allow the driver’s vehicle to remain parked in a ticket parking area after the expiry of the parking ticket displayed in or on the vehicle.
    Maximum penalty: 20 penalty units.

    (5) A driver must not allow the driver’s vehicle to remain parked in a ticket parking area for more than the period of time indicated on or with the permissive parking signs that designate the area as the maximum time for which a vehicle may be parked in the area.
    Maximum penalty: 20 penalty units.

    (6) A driver who parks in a ticket parking area does not contravene this rule if:
    (a) the area is, or forms part of, a metered parking area or a coupon parking area and the driver complies with these Rules in relation to parking in a metered parking area or coupon parking area (as the case requires), or
    (b) the driver parks for a period not exceeding the period (if any) for which no fee is payable for parking in the area, or
    (c) the driver parks outside the controlled parking hours for the area, or
    (d) the driver’s vehicle is displaying a current mobility parking scheme authority, or
    (e) the driver’s vehicle is displaying a current parking permit while it is parked in the area and the area is located on a length of road specified in the permit and the area is designated for use by the holder of the permit.

    Note.
    Controlled parking hours, mobility parking scheme authority and parking permit are defined in the Dictionary, coupon parking area is defined in rule 207–5 and metered parking area is defined in rule 207–1.

    (7) Nothing in this rule prevents a driver from parking in different parts of the same ticket parking area while displaying the same parking ticket.
    Note.

    This rule is an additional NSW road rule. There is no corresponding rule in the Australian Road Rules.

    207–4 NSW rule: parking in ticket parking spaces

    (1) A driver must not park in any ticket parking space:
    (a) while any other vehicle is parked in the space, or
    (b) in such a manner that any part of the vehicle lies over the markings for the space.

    Maximum penalty: 20 penalty units.

    Note.
    A driver (along with other persons) may also commit offences under clauses 102 and 103 of the Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Regulation 1999 if he or she misuses or damages a parking ticket or ticket machine.

    (2) A ticket parking space is a parking bay in a ticket parking area that is indicated by studs, pads, plates or strips.
     

    Burke Elphick & Mead Lawyers deliver a large range of legal services including business and commercial law, family law, criminal law, traffic law, employment, wills and estates, compensation, motor vehicle and insurance law. Should you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact our office.

    The above information is of a general nature only and cannot be relied on as constituting legal advice.  In this respect, we rely upon our Disclaimer at www.bemlaw.com.au/privacy-disclaimer

    Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

    Negligent Driving – Is a finding of guilt required for compensation?

    The following question was posted on our Facebook page:

    A group of tri-athletes were riding on the highway during a training session and were cleaned up from behind by an old man in his Mazda. The driver wasn't charged but the bikes were totalled and athletes severely injured. What are the chances of winning a case when the police never found the driver guilty of negligent driving?

    Emma Mead, our Accredited Specialist in Personal Law, has provided the following response:

    Continue reading

    Posted in Accidents & Insurance Law, Civil Law, Compensation Law, General, Legal, Personal Injury, Traffic Law | Leave a comment

    Reporting Motor Vehicle Accidents to Police – The Police Accident Report Requirement

    If you are injured in a motor vehicle accident, it is important to ensure that you report the accident to the Police. This protects your possible entitlements to compensation under the Motor Accidents Compensation Act, 1999 ('the Act').

    The “police accident report requirement” is contained under section 70 (1) of the Act, which states;

    Unless a police officer attended the motor accident, a motor accident that gives rise to a claim must be reported to a police officer by or on behalf of the claimant within 28 days after the motor accident. This requirement is referred to in this section as the police accident report requirement.

    Continue reading

    Posted in Accidents & Insurance Law, Civil Law, Compensation Law, General, Legal, Personal Injury, Traffic Law | Leave a comment

    Stopping and parking near intersections

    Recently on our Facebook page the following question was asked:
     I was dropping off my grandson at Lambton Public School when a police office stopped me and advised that I was parked illegally and should move. I asked him to explain to me further "why" he was quite vague. The area where I was parked is on Croudace Road (the main road from Lambton to Charlestown, in front of the hairdressers) between a pedestrian crossing (lights) and a street corner. The 2 to 3 parking spots are used every day for parents picking up and dropping kids off for school. There is a not stopping sign on either side of the crossing. The cars obey that sign and outside of that. The officer advised me that there were certain rule about parking certain distances from pedestrian crossing and street corners. Can you clarify for me what the rules are around this so that if there is a problem I can let the school know so parents can avoid getting fined?

    I have had a chance to take a look at the spot you are referring to. You are correct, there is a no stopping sign pointing north to where the traffic light crossing is. There does not appear to be any signs or yellow lines prohibiting parking south of that sign. Obviously there is another sign north of the lights stopping people from parking between it and the lights. As it is the approach to the crossing, obviously it is a greater distance from the lights then the sign on the southern side.

    Continue reading

    Posted in Criminal Law, General, Legal, Traffic Law | 2 Comments

    Mobile Phones and Driving – When Can I Be Fined?

    Due to some ambiguity in what was “use” of a phone when driving, the drafters of our legislation amended Rule 300 of the Road Rules 2008. It should be noted that this rule does not apply to L and P plate drivers. They are completely prohibited from using a phone in any way or in any manner while driving. Rule 300 now states:

    (1) The driver of a vehicle (except an emergency vehicle or police vehicle) must not use a mobile phone that the driver is holding in his or her hand while the vehicle is moving, or is stationary but not parked, unless the driver is exempt from this rule under another law of this jurisdiction.
    Maximum penalty: $2200.

    (1–1) Sub rule (1) does not apply to the driver of a vehicle who is the holder of a learner licence or provisional P1 licence. 

    (2) In this rule: 

    mobile phone 

    does not include a CB radio or any other two-way radio.

    use 

    in relation to a mobile phone, includes the following: 

    (a) holding the phone to, or near, the ear (whether or not engaged in a phone call),

    (b) writing, sending or reading a text message on the phone,

    (c) turning the phone on or off,

    (d) operating any other function of the phone.

    The first step in the offence is that the phone must be in your hand when being used. This allows for the use of the phone while in a hands-free kit etc. If the phone is in your hand then what is a “use” of the phone is extremely broad. It is our view that (d) above covers every function contained on the phone. For example, the use of an iPod function on the phone will fit the definition contained in the offence. The broad interpretation of (d) above is supported in the case law. Some interesting passages from the case law are:

    1. In the case of DPP v Chresta [2005] NSWSC 233:

    a. It becomes difficult in that context to say, other than as has the prosecution in a written submission, that there is a general intent behind the rules to achieve safety [13];

    b. The distraction, to which the safety requirement said to be behind the rule might apply, would occur in the receiving and making of communications but, of course, that is not the only way hand-held mobile phones may be used. They may be used nowadays, not only as message-sending devices, but also as cameras for the purpose of photography, music playing devices, calendars or calculators, they may have all manner of functions, but they are still popularly described, even when those other functions or uses are being resorted to, as hand-held mobile phones [14]; and

    c. But, what is shown on the web site is consistent with the Director’s submission, which I hold is correct, that whilst driving, to turn the phone on or off is a use, which is within the section. It is an operation of the phone. It would be even more an operation if communications were to be made or received [20].

    2. In Burns v Police [2007] SASC 191:

    a. There are many ordinary and well-known ways in which one may “use” a “hand-held mobile phone”. These include saving a phone number in the phone’s electronic address book, retrieving a phone number from the phone’s electronic address book, dialling a phone number, talking on the phone, answering an incoming phone call, writing and sending an SMS (Short Message Service), reading a received SMS, writing and sending an email, reading a received email, playing a video game, listening to music, reading news articles from the internet or subscription based services, browsing the internet and downloading content (eg videos, music, games), taking a photo and browsing the user’s photo library, and recording a video and browsing the user’s video library [23];

    b. It is possible that a number of these activities were not envisaged by the legislature at the time that it enacted the Australian Road Rules, but this does not mean that “use” should not encompass these broader activities — what is important is the fact that the offence that the legislature enacted proscribes the “use” of a hand-held mobile phone [24];

    c. As the number of uses of mobile phones has expanded over the years, so has the number of activities that r 300 prohibits [25]; and

    d. Rule 300 is sufficiently wide in its natural meaning to apply to the present case. Moreover, there is no reason to interpret r 300 in any other way. This interpretation accords with the purpose behind r 300 of ensuring that the safety of motorists and pedestrians is not adversely affected by motorists using hand-held mobile phones. 

    If you have received an infringement notice and you believe that you are not guilty of the offence, or if you have received a licence suspension as a result of the infringement, please contact Michael Burke (Newcastle) or Kara Greiner (Sydney), our criminal and traffic law solicitors, to discuss your options.

    Burke Elphick & Mead Lawyers deliver a large range of legal services including business and commercial law, family law, criminal law, traffic law, employment, wills and estates, compensation, motor vehicle and insurance law. Should you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact our office.

    The above information is of a general nature only and cannot be relied on as constituting legal advice.  In this respect, we rely upon our Disclaimer at www.bemlaw.com.au/privacy-disclaimer

    Posted in Accidents & Insurance Law, Criminal Law, General, Legal, Traffic Law | Leave a comment